Friday, January 1, 2010

Designing our Future with Babies: It's All About the Control.

Every parent wants their child to grow up to be strong, smart, and good-looking, to say the least, but how far are they willing to go for it?


The Human Genome Project, which began in 1990, has given scientists an abundance of information on the genes of the human genome and a completed gene map. This information about or DNA allows us to predict and genetically modify our children’s features.


Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is the first step towards designer babies. PGD determines which embryos carry defects and gene mutations, such as cystic fibrosis, muscular dystrophy, and Huntington's chorea. These tests are offered at fertility clinics all over Canada and are the first step in creating designer babies. This first step is, in my opinion, purely ethical because the parents are only doing what is best for the child by making sure that their baby will be healthy. If the embryos are found to have defects then gene therapy comes into play. Using gene therapy, the defective genes can be replaced by normal genes to cure a genetic disorder; of which there are currently over 3500. Once you get these first two steps down, taking a PGD test and going through gene therapy to cure genetic disorders, you are still acting in your child’s best interests and only thinking of their safety and health.


This is the part where it gets tricky. While you’re already altering your child’s genes, you might as well alter their appearance too, right? Boy or girl? Tall or short? Brown haired or blonde?



Wrong.


This is when parents take genetic modification a step too far. The purpose of procreation is to create a child that is uniquely yours, with bits of you and your partner in it. As soon as PGD is used for non-therapeutic use it purely for the parents, not the child. Sure, some people will argue that the parents still only have the child’s best interests in mind because they just want their child to be attractive and have a better life. Well, looks won’t get you a better life, but the way your parents raise you will. Parents that do “design” their babies and under the illusion that being pretty will help their baby, but really “ugly” babies and people do fine in life as well. I mean look at Taylor Lautner, his face isn’t the prettiest but he sure is doing well in life so far. But seriously, the way your baby looks will only take them so far, if the parents really care about their baby then they won’t care what they look like and will raise them to be successful in life.


We were all made the way we are for a reason; whether you believe that God is the reason behind that or not.


The executive director of the Center for Genetics and Society, Richard Hayes, stated, “We support the use of that [embryo screening] to allow couples at risk to have healthy children. But for non-medical, cosmetic purposes, we believe this would undermine humanity and create a techno-eugenic rat race.”


Eugenics - the science of improving a human population by controlled breeding to increase the occurrence of desirable heritable characteristics.


In many countries, particularly China, the gene altering technology is used to avoid the birth of female children. Also, if the technology continues and the designing aspect develops, babies will be objectified as commodities.


The idea of babies as commodities will only happen if we accept the idea of ‘designer babies’ into our society and allow it to be seen as ‘normal’ and acceptable. Once society accepts this then babies won’t be treated as special when you can just go to the clinic and ‘order’ the one you want.



Parents need to get over their ‘I just want what’s best for my child’ attitude, because usually they don’t actually see what is best for them, they just think they do. How many times has your parent tried that on you? The line, “We just want what is best for you” is commonly used by your parents when they force you into doing something you don’t want to do, such as going to a certain university, or just taking piano lessons.


After the safety of the child is certain then we must leave gene therapy at that, and not go any further to alter them in other ways. In a way, humans are all about control. We love the feeling of being in control and feel that we have to control everything around us. Even the birth of our babies.


Humans need to relinquish control and let nature take its course.


Sources:

Kiem, Brandon. “Designer Babies: A Right to Choose?” Wired Science. Condé Nast Digital. Mar. 2009. http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/03/designerdebate/.

National Post. “Will screening for birth defects lead to ‘designer babies’?” Canada.com. October 5, 2005. http://www.canada.com/topics/lifestyle/parenting/story.html?id=af85fffa-81df-4c47- b389-d7eefc2faccf&k=7781


Steere, Mike. “Designer babies: Creating the perfect child” Center for Genetics and Society. October 30, 2008. http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=4349





Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Endangered Species Reserves Help to Sustain Biodiversity in our Ecosystems

If the Lion is considered King of the jungle then humans should be considered as Kings of the world. The decisions and actions that we make so casually impact the world daily no matter how small we feel that decision or action is. In a way, we control the fate of the Earth and have the power to lengthen or shorten it's life span. The majority of our interventions impact the biodiversity of our ecosystems negatively,

such as poaching/hunting, trapping, pollution, depletion, genetic engineering, global warming, and many, many other harmful actions. However, despite the overload of damaging human interventions, we are still capable of helping our ecosystems. An example of human intervention that has positively affected the biodiversity of our ecosystems is endangered species reserves. There are multiple endangered species reserves located in Canada, including New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Ontario, and British Columbia. By creating these reserves, humans have the ability and opportunity to save many species from extinction. The results of this human intervention are proven to be positive because there have been many encouraging examples of recovery activities. Species such as the White-top aster, Massasauga, and North Atlantic Right Whale have all been recovered from the brink of extinction and are examples of the positive results of endangered species reserves. Since many species are being saved, humans can maintain the biodiversity of our ecosystems through their efforts in reserves. As environmental stewards we have the responsibility of environmental quality shared by all those whose actions affect the environment (United States Environmental Protection Agency 1). As a result of the strong effects that our actions have, I would say that we are definitely being stewards of the world and should take on that responsibility even more so. We manage our planet’s species and our space (both negatively and positively), however we need to accept even more responsibility so that our human interventions only affect the biodiversity of our ecosystems in a positive way.



Sources:


United States Environmental Protection Agency. "Environmental Stewardship." April 30, 2009

http://www.epa.gov/stewardship/


Hinterland Who's Who. "Species at Risk in Canada." Canadian Wildlife Federation. 2009

http://www.hww.ca/hww2.asp?cid=4&id=232


Images from: http://www.hww.ca/hww2.asp?cid=4&id=232


Commented on:


Demijel Junio - Wong

http://bioblogbydemi.blogspot.com/2009/09/whats-going-on.html


Jed's Blog

http://dejedj.blogspot.com/2009/09/unit-2-wellat-least-humanity-got-what.html